Minnesota Senate Finance Committee informational hearing​ on the impacts of online sports gambling

Minnesota Senate Finance Committee informational hearing​ on the impacts of online sports gambling.​ (Video of hearing is below.) Attorney Matthew Litt of NJ joined Les Bernal of Stop Predatory Gambling at the Minnesota State Capitol. Atty. Litt speaks in detail about “VIP practices” at about the 12 minute mark. Three different academics who were co-authors of the three different high profile studies about the impacts of online sports gambling released in 2024 all testified for the first time at this hearing as well. Their testimony begins somewhere after the 33 minute mark of the video. Here’s the link to watch the informational hearing:

Les BernalMinnesota Senate Finance Committee informational hearing​ on the impacts of online sports gambling
read more

“The Big Gamble” – watch the documentary film by Fault Lines

One of the nation’s most respected documentary film programs, Fault Lines, an Emmy- and Peabody Award-winning show, released a must-watch groundbreaking film into online gambling operators and the devastation they are causing upon millions of Americans, especially young people.

While there has been some good journalism in recent times into the major problem of predatory gambling, there has not been been a group of journalists at the time of this writing who have better understood the scope and scale of the problem, and communicated it more boldly and effectively, than the journalists at Fault Lines, Correspondent Josh Rushing and Senior Producer Jeremy Young.

Les Bernal“The Big Gamble” – watch the documentary film by Fault Lines
read more

“Raising the Stakes: America’s Growing Sports Gambling Addiction” – CBS News Films

As more states legalize gambling, online sportsbooks have spent billions courting the next generation of bettors. And now, as mobile apps offer 24/7 access to placing wagers, addiction groups say more young people are seeking help than ever before. CBS News Reports explores what experts say is a hidden epidemic lurking behind a sports betting bonanza that’s leaving a trail of broken lives.

Les Bernal“Raising the Stakes: America’s Growing Sports Gambling Addiction” – CBS News Films
read more

Examining the economic impacts of new casinos: City & State New York

Read the whole story here. Here’s an excerpt:

“What my research indicates is that casinos don’t add to the economy of a city – in fact, in recessionary times, they subtract from the economy,” said Jonathan Krutz, professor emeritus at Boise State University College of Business and Economics. “The revenue going into casinos, by and large, comes locally, so it’s not benefiting local businesses, it’s taking away from local businesses, and the money casinos depend on comes primarily from people who are addicted.”

Despite what developers say about their proposals, economists aren’t convinced that casinos benefit urban communities. In fact, some say that Las Vegas’ success is the exception.

Research suggests casinos aren’t the jobs driver they’re thought to be. The thousands of construction jobs end once the casino is built. Krutz said the permanent jobs are often low-paying and can be unfulfilling to some, since they are based on collecting losses from customers.

“The economic benefit comes when they’re hiring people that are unemployed,” Ursinus College professor of business and economics Andrew Economopoulos said. “If they’re hiring people that already are employed, that’s only switching from one working firm to another working firm.”

 

Les BernalExamining the economic impacts of new casinos: City & State New York
read more

US study examined more than 700,000 online gamblers and only 4% made money from online betting

In a first-of-its-kind study from the University of California San Diego Rady School of Management, researchers have identified comprehensive insights into the positive and negative impacts of online gambling legalization on tax revenue and gambling behaviors in the U.S. They find it enhances state revenues, but increases irresponsible gambling, especially among lower-income consumers.

“Our data show that online gambling legalization leads to more irresponsible gambling spending among lower-income consumers than among higher-income gamblers,” said Kenneth C. Wilbur, professor of marketing and analytics at the Rady School and co-author of the study. “We define gambling irresponsibly as spending a high proportion of their income —for example, 10%—on gambling.”

The authors of the working paper analyzed five years of data from a total of 32 states. They compared 18 states that changed online gambling policies to 14 states that did not have gambling policy changes using a generalized synthetic control framework, a method used by economists and data scientists to evaluate government policy changes as natural experiments.

Authors applied the framework to data from four sources, including comprehensive state revenue and tax data, national gambler helpline calls, Center for Disease Control suicide records and digital payment records for a balanced panel of 717,724 online gamblers.

“Of the more than 700,000 gamblers that we studied, 96% percent appeared to lose money to online gambling,” Wilbur said. “Only 4% made money from online betting. That is by design. Online gambling platforms often ban or throttle frequent winners’ accounts. There is no right to gamble.”

Low-income gamblers are most likely to increase irresponsible gambling after state policy changes

For around 250,000 participants, researchers could analyze gambling expenditure as a percentage of income, thanks to direct deposit data. In Canada, responsible gambling guidelines advise gamblers to spend less than 1% of monthly income on gambling. However, the direct deposit dataset revealed that 43% of panel gamblers exceeded 1% of income in gambling months, with 5.3% spending more than 10% of their income on gambling and 3.2% spending more than 15% of their monthly pay.

“Our analysis shows that online gambling legalization leads to far more problematic gambling among lower-income gamblers than among higher-income gamblers,” Wilbur said. “These findings emphasize the high financial risk associated with online gambling.”

“We tried to collect as many relevant and comprehensive data sets as we could to help inform policy makers,” Wilbur said. “Given our results, a concern of legislators could be that while they see tax revenue rolling in and much of that spending is coming from the wealthier individuals i.e. ‘whales.’ But, if you look more closely, the people experiencing the most gambling problems are likely to be the smaller-scale, lower-income gamblers, i.e., ‘minnows.’ This might justify more spending on assistance for problem gamblers.”

Download the UC-San Diego study here.

Les BernalUS study examined more than 700,000 online gamblers and only 4% made money from online betting
read more

From Victim of Predatory Gambling to Passionate Advocate for Reform

By Matthew Anderson

At about 10am on November 19, 2023, I awoke in the Riverside County (CA) Sheriff’s Department jail with no idea how I had gotten there. The last clear memory I had of the night before was playing blackjack at Pechanga Casino, one of more than a dozen Native American tribal casinos within an hour’s drive of my home in the San Diego area. I was released and took an Uber back to Pechanga. My vehicle was still in valet and my belongings still in my hotel room. I had been arrested by Pechanga Tribal Police and transported to jail at about 3AM. My head was pounding and I had thrown up several times while in jail.

On the ride back in the Uber, I noticed that I had received several texts and emails from my bank about a $50,000 cash withdrawal. This has to be a mistake. There is no way that I could have withdrawn $50,000 on a Sunday night in a casino. My ATM card has a $1,500 daily limit. I returned to Pechanga and after gathering my vehicle and belongings, I was given a lifetime ban notice from Pechanga. I asked about the $50,000 transaction and was told that I needed to leave the property immediately.

Extreme depression and suicidal ideation set in over the next few days. I had been battling a gambling addiction for over 30 years but nothing like this had ever happened. When I processed what had happened, the first thought that came to mind was “that was predatory” so I Googled “predatory gambling” and Stop Predatory Gambling was the first link that appeared. I reached out to Les Bernal and he was gracious enough to respond to my email, listen and share info about Stop Predatory Gambling. Without knowing, Les had talked me off the ledge,

I have a law enforcement and criminal justice background and I needed to find out exactly what had happened that night. I enlisted the assistance of the California Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control and the California Department of Justice. My investigation revealed that Pechanga had served me between 18-22 bourbons in the 4 hours that I was gambling $1,000-$5,000 hands of blackjack, stakes that I had never gambling before. I was also able to determine that Pechanga had circumvented my banking safeguards in order to access the $50,000. No wondering that I couldn’t recall what had happened and felt so deathly ill in the following days. My blood alcohol content was a potentially lethal .36-.44%.

I have made every national Zoom meeting since Les’s initial invitation. I feel honored and privileged to be a part of an organization with such a noble cause. Stop Predatory Gambling has become an integral part of my recovery. Because of the wisdom and passion that you share, along with therapy and a deeper connection with my faith, 2024 has been a gamble- and alcohol-free year. I have filed a civil lawsuit against Pechanga that is making its way through the tribal court. I will be forever grateful to Les for responding to my email and taking my calls. Being a part of Stop Predatory Gambling has truly changed my life.

The author lives in San Diego, CA

Stone Creek DevFrom Victim of Predatory Gambling to Passionate Advocate for Reform
read more

A Psychiatrist Tried to Quit Gambling. Betting Apps Kept Her Hooked.

Psychiatrist Dr. Kavita Fischer of Pennsylvania was profiled in The Wall Street Journal on Feb. 18, 2024. 

Kavita Fischer couldn’t believe her luck.

She started with $750 and hit a hot streak last summer that stretched over six days. She played round after round of online casino games until her winnings hit $500,000. The windfall would make up for every bad bet and pay off all she owed.

Fischer, a 41-year-old mental-health professional and suburban homeowner with two boys, was by then in debt by six figures from online gambling losses. For nearly a year, she lost again and again, complaining to at least one gambling company that she had a problem but couldn’t stop. As a psychiatrist familiar with human impulses and addiction, Fischer knew better than most what she needed to do.

Yet she was up against an industry skilled in the art of leveraging data analytics and human behavior to keep customers betting. Gambling companies tracked the ups and downs of Fischer’s betting behavior and gave bonus credits to keep her playing. VIP customer representatives offered encouragement and gifts.

After her six-day hot streak, Fischer made several requests to start withdrawing the half-million dollars from the PointsBet gambling app. But she kept changing her mind and plowed the money back into play.

Within a day, she lost nearly all of it. “There’s nothing in your brain that says, ‘OK, stop now, you’re done. You’ve won your money back, you can put this behind you,’” Fischer said. “There was just something in my brain that made me keep going.”

The more than $15-billion-a-year online gambling industry grew out of a 2018 Supreme Court decision that cleared the way for states to allow and regulate sports betting. Now, 30 states and the District of Columbia have approved online sports wagering 24 hours a day.

Online casino gambling, which became Fischer’s habit, is legal in six states and has been an industry gold mine.

In November 2022, Fischer downloaded the app from DraftKings, one of the top two online-betting companies in the U.S. along with FanDuel. She was looking for relief from the stress of a recent divorce and the isolation of working from home in the pandemic. She found Slingo, a bingo-style matching game as simple to play as a slot machine.

Soon after Fischer started playing, a customer representative sent an email introducing himself. At DraftKings and other online betting companies, they are identified as VIP hosts.

“I look forward to working with you and building a great relationship!” Jamyl Cogdell wrote on Dec. 9, 2022. Over four months, Fischer said they exchanged dozens of emails and text messages. Cogdell didn’t respond to requests for comment, and DraftKings declined to comment on his behalf.

DraftKings and other gambling companies doled out tens of thousands of dollars in credits that kept Fischer playing long after she wanted to quit.

Casinos have always wooed their high-rollers with special treatment, but online-betting has intensified industry tactics. Companies closely track betting habits 24 hours a day, collecting such data as how much time each customer spends on an app, how much money they gamble, what kind of bets they place and how much they lose.

With a real-time view of a customer’s gambling activity, VIP hosts keep in close touch. They can track when customers last used the app and offer credits and other incentives to persuade their most-valued gamblers—by definition, the biggest losers—to return. Payment options give gamblers immediate access to funds that some can’t cover.

Gamblers are assigned VIP hosts based on how much they are wagering. The personal attention pays off. At PointsBet—acquired in 2023 by Fanatics, a sports-merchandise company—VIP sports bettors representing 0.5% of the customer base generated more than 70% of the company’s revenue in 2019 and 2020, according to internal company documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

Fischer at times bet tens of thousands of dollars a spin. As her losses grew, Fischer texted her sister in Florida, saying she had a gambling problem. Fischer’s sister said she told her to seek help.

Meantime, the VIP offers kept coming.

“How was your weekend? I just added the following offer to get your Tuesday started off right: Earn $30 casino credits for every $1,000 wagered on Slots,” Cogdell wrote to Fischer on Jan. 17, 2023, “up to $1,000 over 72 Hours.”

Looking back, Fischer said she became a psychiatrist to understand the mysteries of the human brain. Over the course of about 11 months, she became a mystery to herself. “You know you’re wasting your life or time or money,” she said. “You just can’t get out.”

Online gambling companies say that most people play for entertainment, and that they can minimize harm to customers.

“DraftKings is committed to the highest standards of consumer protections and responsible gaming,” said Jennifer Aguiar, the company’s chief compliance officer. The company declined to comment about Fischer.

This account is based on interviews, emails and financial records.

Try, try again

Fischer, a co-valedictorian of her high school in Florida, finished her residency in psychiatry in 2012 at the University of Pittsburgh. She appreciated the art and science of her profession, getting to know patients as a way to understand their illnesses.

She lives in a two-story house with walls of windows overlooking the rolling hills of her Pittsburgh suburb. Her two young sons play soccer. Over the years, she sometimes visited a nearby casino to see a 1980s cover band, budgeting $100 to pay for food, drinks and craps games on her night out.

During the pandemic, playing casino games on her phone started out as a way to unwind after the boys went to sleep. Soon, she was gambling late into the night. As she lost, she spent more time and money trying to reverse her fortunes. “I’ll do it this time,” she recalled thinking. Instead, her losses grew.

She hoped to dig her way out and the free credits gave her a reason to keep trying. DraftKings sent her a 14-person tent that she sold for $500. The company invited her to a Steelers football game to watch from a suite with food and drinks.

On Jan. 9, 2023, Fischer emailed her DraftKings host to say she was “doing terribly” at Slingo and should try a different game “or quit gambling completely.”

“In the meantime, is there any way you can send me some VIP love?” she asked.

The host added a $500 bonus to her account. “Hope you can get hot!” he said. Later that month, he asked Fischer to check in once a week to see if she was eligible for promotions and credits.

To fund her gambling, Fischer spent savings and retirement funds and took out personal loans. She used credit cards that treat gambling transactions as cash advances, charging interest rates as high as 33%.

Fischer discovered Pavilion Payments, which works with betting companies to provide a service called VIP Preferred. The program gives bettors access to money without waiting for bank transfers to clear. When Pavilion, a Las Vegas-based company, tried to collect what Fischer owed, she often came up short, triggering collection notices. Pavilion said it promotes responsible gambling.

Several times, Fischer imposed limits on her betting through tools provided on the apps, including DraftKings. She would cap her spending or temporarily block herself from placing bets. When those restrictions expired, she started spending again.

As her debts grew, Fischer tried in January to sign up for a state-run program that allows gamblers to ban themselves from all betting apps legal in Pennsylvania—for a year, five years or a lifetime. Fischer said she got an error message and gave up.

“I’m hurting this week—would you please be able to do one more bonus so I can try to turn my luck around tomorrow?” Fischer said in a March 8, 2023, email to her VIP host.

The host credited her account with $500. “Hoping this will get you on the right track!” he wrote.

Later in March, Fischer’s boyfriend took her for a getaway in Cancún, Mexico, but she couldn’t stop thinking about her swelling financial problems. She was $1,200 short on her mortgage and wrote her DraftKings host asking if they offered loans to VIP customers.

The host said no. He asked if Fischer was gambling within her means. “We take responsible gaming very seriously here,” he wrote, and included a link to DraftKings tools that would allow her to limit bets or impose a temporary ban.

After returning home, Fischer told her DraftKings host she was gambling within her budget. “Okay perfect,” he said and gave her a $250 credit “to get you back in action.”

In April, DraftKings said she was no longer eligible for a VIP host but didn’t give a reason. Frustrated, Fischer demanded her account be closed. In the first four months of 2023, she lost about $141,000 to the company. During that time, DraftKings gave her more than $36,000 in gambling credits. Overall, she lost more than $190,000 to DraftKings in 2022 and 2023.

Fischer wrote to DraftKings in May, saying she was addicted to gambling and needed help. “I do believe I could have been protected better,” she said. “My VIP host could see the time I spent gambling as well as the amounts.” She asked to be reimbursed for a portion of her losses.

A member of DraftKings’ Player Protection Team said in an email that she couldn’t get a refund for her losses.

“We are sorry to hear about your experience with our platform and the financial issues you now are facing,” a representative of DraftKings’ Player Protection wrote. The email included phone numbers for gambling hotlines and links to gambling addiction websites.

“I would have stopped a long time ago,” Fischer said. “Those VIP bonuses would get me back in.”

Stoking desire

Psychologists say that for gamblers, placing a bet triggers the brain to release dopamine, a chemical that creates a sense of pleasure and anticipation. The feelings surge while awaiting the next spin of the slot machine or the next football play. Gamblers seek the feeling repeatedly, regardless of winning or losing. Some can’t stop.

The online betting industry in the U.K. has been under scrutiny over concerns about gambling addiction and the marketing practices of betting companies. Regulators cited bonuses and VIP programs as tools companies employ to keep customers gambling and losing.

In 2020, U.K. regulators imposed restrictions on VIP programs, which target big spenders. The rules required the companies to check on whether gamblers could afford the amounts they were betting and rein in credit giveaways. Regulators have since reported a 90% reduction in the number of customers in VIP programs.

PointsBet as recently as 2022 categorized its sports-betting customers based on their wagering patterns, according to internal company documents viewed by the Journal. One type of valued customer was known as a “Dave,” which the company has described as a man, aged 30 to 45, making at least $150,000 a year. Daves bet about 100 days out of the year with an average wager of $500.

The company also labeled customers making an average bet of less than $20 as a “Chad,” marking them as less desirable gamblers. PointsBet had stopped using the terminology by the time it was acquired by Fanatics, a Fanatics spokesman said.

Psychologists who study gambling addiction say companies collect enough data to identify sports-bettors and online-casino customers with a problem.

The biggest sign is known as chasing losses—attempting to recoup losses by gambling more. One trackable indicator is when bettors make frequent deposits into their gambling accounts, according to a U.K. study. 

On some days, for instance, Fischer made a dozen or more deposits into a single app, according to her bank statements: $100. $300. $500.

As states debated legalizing online gambling, companies promised to intervene with problem gamblers, but there are few regulations to ensure compliance.

New Jersey regulators last year started requiring betting companies to use player data to identify at-risk customers. Among the trackable signs are gamblers who increase the amount of time they spend betting each week, and those who wager until they have less than a dollar in their accounts, according to the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement. Other indications include bettors who repeatedly bar themselves from betting apps.

About 94,000 customers had received varying degrees of intervention from online companies, including video tutorials and conversations about responsible gambling, as of October last year, according to the New Jersey attorney general’s office.

Disaster relief

Last July, after Fischer won and lost $500,000 with PointsBet, a customer representative offered in an email to help Fischer set spending limits on the app. The representative asked to arrange a time for a phone call to check on her.

“At PointsBet, we want to ensure that our players are having the best experience possible, and we strongly believe that the best way to do that is to gamble responsibly,” the email said.

In August, Fischer again applied to be banned from gambling apps through the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board. In an automated email on Aug. 3, the agency said her request wasn’t accepted because of discrepancies in her information.

A week later, she tried again and added a personal plea. “I have attempted to self-exclude now for the 4th time/ please let me know if you need anything else from me. Pennsylvania online gambling has wrecked my life,” she said in an email.

The state board confirmed her lifetime ban from online betting platforms three days later. Doug Harbach, a spokesman for the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, said the agency responds when people have trouble signing up for the ban.

In one year, Fischer gambled away more than $400,000 of her own money. “Can you blame someone who has alcohol addiction?” Fischer said. “I don’t.”

She took out a $243,000 home-equity loan to pay off credit cards and personal loans at a lower interest rate. It will cost her $2,400 a month for 15 years, she said. That is on top of her monthly mortgage payment of $3,600 a month.

To settle another $120,000 in credit-card debt, Fischer has payment plans that cost $2,500 a month. She has picked up shifts with a local healthcare provider for extra income.

In August, Fischer attended her first 12-step meeting for gamblers at a local church. She felt afraid and alone, thinking there might be only a few people there. Instead, there was a group of 25. One group member told her not to feel lonely anymore. She cried.

“I was, like, ‘I can’t believe there are so many people here,’” she said.

Fischer is planning a presentation in March to psychiatrists across Pennsylvania about screening for gambling problems. She said she wanted to tell her story, despite the professional and personal risk, to help lift the stigma of gambling addiction

“It can happen to anyone,” she said.

Les BernalA Psychiatrist Tried to Quit Gambling. Betting Apps Kept Her Hooked.
read more